Journal of Scientometric Research logo
Submit
Journal of Scientometric ResearchACADEMIC PUBLISHING
Review

The Bloomsbury Handbook to the Digital Humanities: A Review

1★★ Corresponding author

  1. 1Institute of Development Studies Kolkata, Salt Lake City, Kolkata, INDIA

CORRESPONDENCE

Sanjoy Kar

Institute of Development Studies Kolkata, Salt Lake City, Kolkata, INDIA.

sanjoykar007@ymail.com

Received: 27-11-2023; Revised: 28-04-2024; Accepted: 09-07-2024.

Volume 13, Issue 2 · pp. 655-657 · 2024 · DOI: 10.5530/jscires.13.2.52

ABSTRACT

The Digital Humanities (DH) have evolved into a significant force shaping contemporary academic landscapes, prompting both enthusiasm and skepticism. The DH denotes an interdisciplinary domain that amalgamates computational methods and technologies with conventional humanities research and scholarship. This field engages with the utilization of digital tools, techniques, and methodologies to scrutinize, interpret, and present data pertinent to cultural, historical, and linguistic domains. The spectrum of activities within DH is expansive, spanning text analysis, data visualization, digital archiving, and the creation of digital platforms tailored for scholarly inquiry. According to Gold (2012) “Digital Humanities involves the use of computational methods to analyze, model, and represent humanistic phenomena, as well as to explore new questions at the intersection of computing and the disciplines of the humanities”.[1]

KEYWORDS

0% READ

FULL TEXT

Figures and Tables

Figure

REFERENCES

As published

Showing references and in-text citations exactly as published.

  1. Berry, D. (2022). Critical digital humanities. The Bloomsbury Handbook to the Digital Humanities, 125.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  2. Berry, D, & Fagerjord, A. (2017). Digital humanities: Knowledge and critique in a digital age.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  3. Burdick, A, Drucker, J, Lunenfeld, P, Presner, T, & Schnapp, J. (2016). (2016). Digital_humanities. Mit Press.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  4. Busa, R. (1980). The annals of humanities computing: The index thomisticus. Computers and the Humanities, 14(2), 83–90.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  5. Crane, G, Bamman, D, Cerrato, L, Jones, A, Mimno, D, Packel, A, Sculley, D, & Weaver, G. (2006). (2006). Beyond Digital Incunabula: Modeling the Next Generation of Digital Libraries, 353-, 366.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  6. Gold, M. (2012). Debates in the digital humanities.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  7. Ide, N, & Véronis, J. (1995). Text encoding initiative: Background and contexts. Springer Science & Business Media.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  8. Nyhan, J. (2012). Text encoding and scholarly digital editions. Digital Humanities in Practice, 117-, 38.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  9. Svensson, P, & Goldberg, D. (2015). Between humanities and the digital.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  10. Wang, Q. (2018). Distribution features and intellectual structures of digital humanities: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Documentation, 74(1), 223–46.GOOGLE SCHOLAR
  11. Zriba, H. (2019). The role of digital humanities in the democratization of knowledge. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Studies, 1(4), 82–92.GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Cite this article

SELECT FORMAT

Kar, S. (2024). The Bloomsbury Handbook to the Digital Humanities: A Review. Journal of Scientometric Research, 13(2), 655-657. https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.13.2.52

Copyright and licence

© 2024 Author(s)

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0